Whistleblowing claim investigated by the Civil Aviation Authority: Result that a group of oil companies ( BRITISH PETROLEUM -Total-Texaco and Kuwait Petroleum) fueling aircrafts at Heathrow Airport has violated the obligations of health and safety, placing millions of passengers in danger.
An employment corrupted Judge (Stephen Vowles from Watford /Reading Employment Tribunals) shamefully strikes out the claimant’s claim under rule 37, To Protect the respondent’s reputation.
How Corporations influence the Justice and politicians
Watch the video
Letter to Prime Minister Theresa May 2018
The disabled Claimant sent a formal complaint of judicial conduct (Under Tribunal Rule 2014)to the Employment Tribunals President (Judge Brian Doyle)He answers:
I am afraid that I must now draw a line under this correspondence.I intend you no discourtesy by so doing.Further correspondence from you on these same matters will be filed without acknowledgment or reply.
Link click here Aviation fuel Services LTD accuses his employee of being a Terrorist and Rapist at London Heathrow Airport(unbelievable)
Why Watford Employment Tribunal run by criminals
click here http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5xez2b
Claimant to Representatives of justice
The Ombudsman’s role is to conduct an investigation into the process by which the Tribunal Service handled the investigation into my complaint. Whether it was conducted fairly and appropriately in accordance with set procedures. You and the unlawfully nominated REJ Byrne, have not even considered my complaint.
Where is the report of the outcome of the investigation handled by an investigating judge? Therefore what grounds do I have to contact the ombudsman?
1)The use of racist and violation against a disable person human right act 1998
3)Misusing judicial status for personal gain or advantage
4)Falsified the facts on outcome of decisions
This is the post made by the Employment tribunal in Watford . It is online (False of course)https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-m-longbardi-v-aviation-fuel-services-ltd-3322804-2016
Health and safety at Heathrow Airport message to EASA FAA IATA & CAA
I’m temporarily living in Bologna ( Italy) please contact me only email@example.com
The Employment Appeal Tribunal, Honorable Dishonest Judge David Richardson
Employment’s Appeal tribunal president answer ( after watching my videos on youtube )
LONDONEAT <firstname.lastname@example.org>13 October 2017
Dear Mr Longobardi
The EAT President is not able to determine from your Youtube videos what complaint you wish to make about His Honour Judge Richardson.
If you wish to pursue such a complaint about Judge Richardson, please set out your complaint in writing.
The President is only able to consider complaints about the conduct or behaviour of a judge, she cannot consider a complaint about a judicial decision.
Operational Support Manager
Employment Appeal Tribunal
The Claimant has appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal paying £400 fee.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal, Honorable Judge David Richardson has, after deliberating for three months, dismissed the Appeal. The Claimant is an expert in Employment and Aviation Law and therefore convinced that both the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal are run by dishonest and cheating people.
The House of Commons has blocked my email address email@example.com
Correspondence with all authorities -SFO,NCA,CityLondon police.
When a person who represents justice and misuses their judicial status for personal gain or advantage and Falsifies the facts -is a potential criminal-
Mrs Simler and Mr Justice Lidignton, They both seem to be still deaf and blind
These criminal judges have to go to jail.
Message for Mr David LIDINGTON Lord of Justice
The Claimant has reported this injustice to the the present Government . NO REPLY.
Watch the video below
If You are a victim of your Representatives or dishonest Judges which are open to get a gift from your employer (Do not hesitate to contact me ) support this blog and share It- I’m temporarily living in Bologna ( Italy) please contact me only firstname.lastname@example.org
I studied Employment and Aviation Law . I am creating a group for people who want to expose this puppet government’s cover up of the corruption that exists in the British Justice system, that was once considered to be the fairest in the free world. Justice is for the People and we want our voices heard.
The Dishonest criminal Judge Vowles illegal outcome for profit : Please see the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yM_Q4WzCuQ
UK Justice System is a total deception wake up people
click here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yM_Q4WzCuQ
On 11 June 2017, as part of a Cabinet reshuffle following the 2017 general election, Elisabeth Truss was appointed Chief Secretary to the Treasury. A politician with no legal training and limited experience of the legal world becomes Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor
President Brian Doyle London Central Employment Tribunals Victory House 30-
34 Kingsway London WC2B 6EX
Mr M Longobardi v Aviation Fuel Services Ltd Case Number :3322804/2016 Re: Complaint – Judicial misconduct
Dear President Doyle
Further to your e-mail sent to me today. Having read your response to my complaint (and also the response from Regional Judge Byrne, who was not officially delegated to look into my complaint).
I followed yours and Regional Judge Byrne’s instruction to look at the website for Judicial Conduct and you will see yourself what the website says regarding such a complaint. “Complaints about Tribunal Judges must be made to the relevant Chamber President”.
You should know that the Ombudsman’s role is to conduct an investigation into the process by which the Tribunal Service handled the investigation into my complaint. Whether it was conducted fairly and appropriately in accordance with set procedures.
I have sent my complaint to you President Doyle, by email on 12 May 2017 and by letters dated 26 May 2017.
Please confirm to me, that you are rejecting the consideration of my complaint against members of Watford Employment Tribunal for judicial misconduct. Bearing in mind that Judge Vowles’ attitude towards me was racist, violating the human rights of a disabled person – the evidence of which is in my e-mail to you dated 12 May 2017.
I think you have possibly misunderstood the nature of my complaint, or you have chosen not to understand. I therefore am explaining again to you what my complaint is about.
My ex-employer is a huge group of oil companies and globally believes it has the power to control everything. I have brought several claims to the Employment Tribunal, including a Whistleblowing claim, where my ex employer has failed to to comply with Aviation Health and Safety obligations putting in danger millions of passengers’ lives flying from Heathrow Airport, (confirmed by Civil Aviation Authority). Employment Judge Vowles refused to discuss my Whistleblowing claim at the Preliminary Hearing on 29/09/16, therefore protecting my ex-employer and on 22/11/16, I received a letter from the ET stating that this particular claim was not included. I had to insist on a further Preliminary Hearing to give my evidence. I followed the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA) and I was finally given a date for another Preliminary Hearing on 14/03/17. The Employment Tribunal originally advised both parties on 09/02/17 that the Preliminary Hearing would take place in private (which would protect the Respondent’s reputation). I had to remind the ET that hearings of this context in the UK are to be public. At this point, the Employment Judge assisted the Respondent by ordering that they apply to strike out my Whistleblowing claim, in a letter to both parties, dated 22.02.17.
Judge Vowles wrote “ the Tribunal will also consider the Respondent’s application to strike out the claims on the grounds of unreasonable and vexatious conduct”. I have always shown due respect towards the Tribunal and the Respondent. In the words of Judge Vowles that my conduct was vexatious, this is rude and racist towards me, it is another humiliation against a disabled person, to strike me out at the Preliminary Hearing on 14/03/17. The Judge also ordered the ET office to send me an ‘urgent’ e-mail with this e-mail address email@example.com on 13/03/17 (also sent to the Respondent, the previous day to remind the Respondent, that he should strike out my claim). This amounts to conflict of interest, on behalf of my ex-employer. Thus pushing the Respondent to fabricate an application to strike out my Whistleblowing claim – this was unfortunately not possible to do, as it has already been investigated by the Civil Aviation Authority.
Employment Judge Hill from the ET, Watford refused this application on 08/03/17, the content of which was contained false statement that did not confirm with the criteria of claim. A letter followed dated 09/03/17 from ET Judge Vowles stating that ET Judge Hill’s letter sent to both parties, had been misquoted and the application to strike out had not been refused.
The Respondent has falsified claims in his application by stating that I have not complied with orders, I have clearly showed that I did comply with orders. The Respondent has also included in his application threatening letters, as presented at the Preliminary Hearing on 14/03/17, without providing a statement of truth following Civil Procedure rules. This has shamefully resulted in EJ Vowles accusing me directly of sending such letters to the Respondent, without evidence and this influenced his decision. At the Preliminary Hearing I pointed out many times that I made an application to strike out the Respondent for abuse of proceedings and vexatious conduct, especially producing false statement. I also asked Judge Vowles to record the facts, at the Preliminary Hearing on 14/03/17 but he refused. I advised the ET and the Respondent in my letter dated 28/10/16 that the Respondent had been making false statements and advised the other party to use a moderate tone and behaviour.
In addition, the Respondent has failed to comply with order and unless order date 5/12/16 and 11/01/17. The Respondent has defaulted but the Employment Tribunal has continued to ignore this violation, (how could it be possible that no-one in the ET team dealing with this case did not pick up on this?) assisting the Respondent and in the assumption that the Claimant is ignorant and taking advantage of his disability. I had no alternative but to apply for a statement of truth (Civil Procedure Rule 22.1) and ask the ET formally if the Respondent complied with order and unless order.
The Employment Tribunal has failed to give me a reply to this and I am still awaiting a response to my letter dated 12/04/17. Employment Judge Vowles has chosen to strike me out in whole for reasons of conflict of interest and falsifying the facts. I believe the reasons are based on the influence of my ex-employer (oil companies).
This is a disgraceful scenario and should not happen within the Justice system of this country. You have access to all correspondence via the HMCTS database server recorder firstname.lastname@example.org and can verify that I am telling the Truth
President Brian Doyle London Central Employment Tribunals Victory House 30-34 Kingsway London WC2B 6EX
Mr M Longobardi v Aviation Fuel Services Ltd Case Number :3322804/2016 Re: Justice system in the UK
Further to your e-mail sent to me on 12/06/2017. Having read your response to my complaint, you are confirming that you defend the Watford Tribunal members, in addition you bypass The Judicial Conduct (Tribunals) Rules 2014, for your own convenience. It is sadly disappointing.
II sent you (and only to you) my complaint, on 12 May 2017 but you ignored me and suddenly the REJ Byrne arises again with his megalomaniac letter dated 24/05/2017, informing me that being a Regional Employment Tribunal Judge, he has the power to be responsible for investigating complaint of judicial conduct in accordance with the provisions of conduct tribunal rule 2014. This is gross misconduct.
- Where a complaint is referred to an investigating judge, the relevant President must inform the tribunal member concerned and the complainant accordingly.(With all respect I should probably have for a President of Employment Tribunals, although it seems to me that you think that I am a disabled idiot .Tell me, when exactly did you delegate the REJ Byrne to look into my complaint for an investigation? I was not informed and have not received any notification from you (with the exception of your letter dated 9 June 2017).
I am going to give you a refreshment in employment law again: The Ombudsman’s role is to conduct an investigation into the process by which the Tribunal Service handled the investigation into my complaint. Whether it was conducted fairly and appropriately in accordance with set procedures. You and the unlawfully nominated REJ Byrne, have not even considered my complaint. Where is the report of the outcome of the investigation handled by an investigating judge? Therefore what grounds do I have to contact the ombudsman?
- The relevant President may only dismiss a complaint under rule 54(b) or make a direction under rule 54(c) where the relevant President considers there has been no misconduct.
When I asked you in my letter dated 9 June 2017, if you disagreed with me passing on this information, you did not respond, therefore I assume that you are happy for me to make it public.
If you have discriminated against a disabled person by violating his human right act 1998. If you are worthy of the title President Employment Tribunals and if the ET in Watford is run by honest people, then it will be public opinion to decide, via the worldwide web, in the interest of Justice because the Law belongs to the people.
Huge corporations, (my ex-employer is a large group of oil companies – Total/BP/Texaco/Kuwait Petroleum) will go to any lengths to avoid accountability and safeguard their reputation and image. (you recall the BP oil disaster, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill April 20, 2010 and the failure to comply with health and safety ) This is clearly evident from the facts I have stated above and the threat I received from my ex-employer’s solicitor Mr Marc Jones Turbervilles Solicitors , in a letter dated 05/04/2016.”If you progress with your threats and your actions damage our client’s reputation, then our client will seek legal redress from you” Threat.
In conclusion, I am someone who speaks with authority about Health and Safety in Aviation. I have received specialized training for aircraft fueling and have qualifications in Italy dated Rome 4 June 1999 as employee of Agip (ENI Group)a big oil giant and are the follows: 1)Activities and Aviation Product 2)Health & Safety 3)Product Handling and Quality fuel Control 4)Aircrafts Refueling Operation, I am certain about my affirmation and if anyone has doubts about the credibility of what I am saying, do not hesitate to take action against me for defamation.
lllllllllllllll Mr Vince Costamzo Director Station Ops Support at American Airlines Dallas USA
Falsification of the facts by Employment Judge Vowles
lllllllllllllll Proving and evidence
I am still waiting an answer from the Employment tribunal in Watford, The respondent has defaulted , But The ET ignore It
The respondent has Fabricated false letters and the Judge Vowles has reported on the out come of decision .
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllStatement of Truth CPR 1998
Compliments to the UK Justice System and the Employment Tribunals President Brian Doyle